RootDig.com

St. George Utah 27 February 2010

2010-02-09T10:12:00.001-06:00

I will be making three presentations at the Family History Expo on 27 Feb in St. George, Utah. Topics will be: Court records, Illinois research, and migration. Fans in the area are welcome to come and introduce themselves.

http://www.fhexpos.com/events/presenter.php?sid=248&eid=54

Basco Basketball Team 1930-1931

2010-02-08T20:44:00.003-06:00

This photograph was found in my Granddad (John H. Ufkes)'s things.
It appears to be the Basco, Illinois, High School basketball team from 1930-1931. If anyone can identify anyone in the picture, please email me at mjnrootdig@gmail.com. Thanks!

Who are four of these people?

2010-02-08T18:19:00.001-06:00

I only know who one of the people in this photo is.

The young lady on the far right is Tena/Trientje Janssen Ufkes (1895-1986).

Tena was born in Bear Creek Township in February of 1895 and died in Carthage, Hancock County, Illinois, in 1986.

I do not know who the others are in the picture. This photograph was one that my grandparents had. Tena's son John H. Ufkes (1917-2003), was my grandfather.

Any suggestions as to who the others are would be greatly appreciated.

Flip it Over!

2010-02-08T18:07:00.002-06:00

I've been quickly going through a few things in my grandparents' collection of clippings trying to find something for a Casefile Clues column. I ran across a clipping Grandma made from the church bulletin the Sunday I was baptized.

While she didn't write the date on the clipping, I was lucky. When I flipped the clipping over, the date was right there on the back: 28 July 1968.

The name of the church wasn't there, but that I already knew--Trinity Lutheran in Carthage, Illinois.

I'll have to work on a citation for this in the spirit of Evidence Explained. Everything used in Casefile Clues is always cited, but this probably won't appear there as I usually don't write about myself.

It is not that specific

2010-02-03T09:01:00.003-06:00

This irritates me, but like many things that irritate me I doubt there will be much in the way of any response.

This is a screen shot of part of a timeline from one of the Ancestry Family Trees on a relative of mine. I did not compile the data. I have seen this type of problem numerous times and this is not an isolated case.

The county of birth is correct for this person (at least it agrees with every record I have uncovered), but the county seat (of the same name) is not. There's actually no primary record of this person's birth (too early) and the family likely lived in one of the outlying townships based upon tax and land records. The person was not born in the county seat.

But me disagreeing with the place of birth is not the point. Researchers can reach different conclusions. There is a larger problem with this sourcing.

The way this information is "sourced" seems to indicate that the 1850, 1860, 1870 and censuses provide the county of birth for this individual. They do not. All they give is the state of Ohio (I've seen them all). While I am glad that the Ancestry Trees allow for the inclusion of sources, the way it ends up being done is in a way that is very misleading as it implies the census provides an amount of accuracy that it does not.

For this individual, the 1850, 1860, and 1870 census should be tied as the source of a birthplace of "Ohio," not a place of birth of "Coshocton County, Ohio." That's why we should have multiple places of birth for most ancestors when doing sources accurately. We should not indicate that a source provides more accuracy than it actually does.

Sourcing like this only adds to the confusion and makes it imperative that actual records be used whenever possible.

Sometimes people wonder if there won't be a need for professional genealogists in the future. When I see the ease with which data like this can be compiled I think I know the answer to that question.

George Trautvetter's Civil War Service

2010-02-02T23:34:00.002-06:00

This page comes from the Illinois Adjutant General's Report (Volume 1, published in 1900, page 650) of Company H of the 14th Reorganized Illinois Infantry.

The entry, partially highlighted here, indicates that George A. Trautvetter enlisted on 18 February 1865 and was mustered in on the same day. It also indicates he deserted.

There was another George Trautvetter who served in the 15th Missouri Infantry, Company H who I blogged about before after finding those records on Footnote.com. That George enlisted in Keokuk, Iowa, a very short distance from where George A. Trautvetter lived. I had assumed the George Trautvetter who enlisted in the Missouri regiment and the one listed in this regiment were the same one. Now I am not so certain as George A. Trautvetter's biography contains details not consistent with him enlisting in the Missouri regiment.

It might really be time to obtain the Civil War pension for George A. Trautvetter and see what it has to say about his service---of course if he actually deserted there won't be one.

Who is the other George? Is it a different George? I'm starting to wonder. The problem is: who?

Mention Us on Your Blog, Please!

2010-02-02T11:29:00.004-06:00

I'm not naming the site, the product or the company that sent me an email recently. I've included an altered version of it below.

--------- beginning of altered email (CAPS indicated altered item)---------------------------

The new BLAHBLAH is launching an online giveaway:BLOGABOUTUSANDWIN . One lucky winner will receive a FREETHING from OVERPRICED STUFF, valued at $ANOVERINFLATEDPRICE!

To enter, simply blog or tweet about BLAHBLAH before the RELEASE DATE, link to the official BLAHBLAH site and/or fanpage, and send your permalink to helpussellourstuff@notanemail.com.

Write a second blog or tweet between THISDATE and THATDATE and double your chances of winning.

For full contest details go here: WEBSITE DELETED.

-------------- end of altered email ----------------------

I'm not opposed to marketing. I'm not opposed to making money. I've been known to promote my own newsletter as well. Advertisements (clearly indicated as such) do not present any problem to me. Mentioning something in the text or an article or writing about something solely to "get something out of it" just doesn't sit well with me. I never cared for Paul Harvey for much the same reason. "Write about us and we'll enter you in a contest" just doesn't sit well with me.

If it doesn't bother you, that's fine. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Products, books and other materials are occasionally mentioned here on Rootdig.com. If they get mentioned, it's because I actually use them. Once in a while a researcher or research service gets mentioned--if so, for the same reason. Readers likely will never see books or research materials from Eastern Europe on my site--because I don't have family there. That's it and nothing more.

Years ago a good friend in "genealogyland" asked me to give an hourlong lecture on a genealogy software program that she was thinking about using. I had not used the software yet, but out of great respect for my friend, I agreed to do the presentation and said I would have time to learn it so I could present about it. I learned about the software, created the presentation, and gave the presentation, explaining its use. After using it, I decided I would never buy the software and never recommend its use to anyone (and NO, I'm NOT saying what the name of the software was). I also decided I would never present again on anything that I wasn't already familiar with. I also decided I would never present on something I would not pay for myself.

I never blog about something because someone's offered me something or entered my name in a contest if I mention it. Consequently, if I am not a fan of something or don't use it (because it's not in my areas of research), you won't find it mentioned here. As a result, there may be great things in genealogyland that I simply don't mention because it's not in my area of research.

I've always tried to make my blog/website about actual research and things I actually do or use.

End of soapbox and back to work.

Pig Breeder Transfers Provide Genealogy Clues

2010-02-01T15:10:00.002-06:00

Maybe I have too much time on my hands.

I spent a few minutes today playing on Google Books after a few Casefile Clues readers reported success after reading issue 27. Each hog was given a name and their pedigrees are shown through the grandparents. Typical for animal breeders

The book image here is from the 1911 and was located by searching on rampley "west point." The W. Rampley shown here I am reasonably certain is my great-grandmother's brother. They were children of Riley and Nancy Newman Rampley. There are a few of Nancy's family that I'm trying to track down.

Notice to whom W. Rampley sold several of these hogs--A. W. Newman of Hurdland, Missouri. This may be a clue in locating a few lost members of the Newman clan--and all from a 1911 directory of hog breeders. Not what one would expect.

And for those who wonder what a Chester White is, we've added an image here to this post. It's not one of the sows listed on this page, but it gives off the farm readers an idea.

It is All About Context

2010-01-28T09:22:00.002-06:00

This image is from the 1855 Mercer County, Illinois State Census.

Just a couple of things I noticed while using this image for next week's issue of Casefile Clues.

The names are in rough alphabetical order--that's fairly evident from the screen shot here and very evident when viewing page after page.

So---

The 6th entry on this image--the last name is not all that easy to read, admittedly.

However if I were indexing this page, I would have noticed the names were in approximate alphabetical order. The first letter of the last name begins with either an "S" or a "T." A "T" appears most likely looking at the "S"s right above it.

Ancestry.com indexed the name as "Andrew Frank." I realize why someone might have thought that if I had simply posted the image of the name completely out of context as I did here (although I still think the last two letters look like "sk" or maybe "sh.").

Ancestry.com also titled these 1855 census images a little strangely below the county level too, but I'll leave that comment for later.

It's not all about context, but context is extremely important. Nothing is created or exists in a vacuum.

Happy Birthday Granddad..

2010-01-26T20:28:00.003-06:00

My Granddad Ufkes (John Henry Ufkes) would have been 93 years old tomorrow (27 January). He was born 27 January 1917 to Frederick and Trientje (Janssen) Ufkes on the family farm near Basco, Hancock County, Illinois. Granddad was the only grandfather I ever knew--my Grandpa Neill passed away when I was an infant.

I've posted my version of his obituary on my website.

Happy Birthday and Rest in Peace, Granddad. You deserve it.

Michael

Sample Copy of Casefile Clues

2010-01-24T11:10:00.002-06:00

Readers of the Rootdig.com site can get a sample copy of my weekly newsletter, Casefile Clues, by pointing your browser here:

http://www.casefileclues.com/sample.pdf

Casefile Clues is delivered weekly as a PDF file attached to an email. The sample focuses on a German family, but topics cover the entire United States and a variety of time periods. Emphasis is on sound methodology, citation, and clear writing. Attention is also paid to "why" certain things were done or tried--not that I'm always correct, but at least I try to let readers know what was going on in my head as I was researching.

Questions can be sent to me at mjnrootdig@gmail.com

Incorrect Volume Numbers on Google Books

2010-01-23T21:43:00.002-06:00

This "hit" from Germans to America was located on Google Books. There is no doubt that the desired individuals, Martin Fecht and Kea Goldenstein, appear in Germans to America.

They just don't appear in volume 1 as indicated on the search results which is shown in this image. Volume 1 of Germans to America covers the early 1850s and Fecht and Goldenstein (and the rest of the names shown) arrived in NYC in March of 1881.

In working on the next issue of Casefile Clues, I've discovered that in some books from a series that appear in "snippet" form, the actual volume number listed is incorrect. Anyone else noticed this?

My first in an ongoing series of articles on Google Books will appear in issue 26 of Casefile Clues, scheduled for distribution in a few days.

Hand on the image

2010-01-21T18:10:00.003-06:00

This was a page I stumbled upon while playing around with Google Books for an upcoming issue of Casefile Clues.

Apparently the digitization of books by Google is not a completely automated process--as the hand here shows.

Just thought it was a neat image. Thankfully they didn't cover up anything I needed--that's usually the way it goes.

Laying the Groundwork for Salt Lake City FHL Trip

2010-01-21T17:39:00.000-06:00

I'm laying the groundwork for the few things I want to look up for myself or for future writing when I am in Salt Lake City this coming May at the Family History Library. Nothing too fancy yet, but thinking about things. It is never too early to get started and our trip participants have already been given preliminary information about the trip.

It's not too late to my group in May/June for a week in Salt Lake City at the Family History Library. Your research will never be the same.

I still have a stack of things (ok, a flash drive full of images) from the last time I was there. I will read through those in the next month to see if there were any leads I need to follow up on my next trip.

Embedded Image from Google Books

2010-01-21T17:17:00.002-06:00

This is a test post. This is a part of page 534 of the Encyclopedia of the history of Missouri: a compendium of history and Biography, published in 1901. Levi Rhodes is my wife's ancestor. This page is from the history of Sand Hill in Scotland County, Missouri.

Books on Pig Breeders Counts as Juvenile Fiction

2010-01-21T11:45:00.002-06:00

One really has to wonder sometimes. While working on a Casefile Clues article, I stumbled across this reference on Google Books.

The first two books were published by various hog breeder associations. Google books classifies them as "juvenile fiction."

If they were Charlotte's Web, maybe, but that's not what these books are about.

More on 1950 census substitute at Ancestry.com

2010-01-21T09:11:00.002-06:00

I have been playing just a little with 1950 Census Substitute at Ancestry.com.

This image comes from the 1947 directory for Rock Island, Illinonis and shows my wife's grandparents, Wilbur and Grace Johnson living at 1011 14th Street in Rock Island. They owned the house and Wilbur was employed at Servus Rubber.

This one is a little more helpful than some of the others as the spouses are listed.

1950 Census Substitute at Ancestry.com

2010-01-21T08:57:00.002-06:00

1950 Census Substitute has been released as a database at Ancestry.com. Don't get me wrong. I use Ancestry.com regularly. However, one has to take this database with a grain of salt. It is NOT a census substitute. A substitute is a record that serves the same purpose as the original record and intends to collect the same information. The 1950 Census Substitute at Ancestry.com does not do that.

City directories generally list heads of households and occasionally their spouses. The 1950 census listed everyone by name. Remember that when using the 1950 directories, they were not created to list everyone.

Keep in mind also that the city directories currently on Ancestry.com generally are for larger urban area. That leaves those of us with rural ancestors out until the actual census is released. And the 1950 census is not scheduled for release until 2022. That's just a little while--but I still won't be listed.

The image shown in this post comes from the 1951 directory for Rock Island. The entry at 1207 is my wife's great-grandfather, Henry Mortier. I'm assuming the little "bell" means he has a phone. The circle thing I'm not certain. My quick scan of the front of the book found a list of abbreviations, but somehow I missed the symbols. If anyone has them, let me know--I'd like to post them.

The "census substitute" is a great source--but just remember what it is and what it's limitations are.

Bureau County Illinois Society Newsletter Mentions Casefile Clues

2010-01-18T20:01:00.002-06:00

Casefile Clues received a very nice write up in the January-February 2010 issue of the Bureau County Genealogical Society Newsletter. Janes Jones, editor, had several nice things to say about Casefile Clues and I appreciate the mention. I've spoken to the group in Princeton several times over the past ten years. It's always a good time and an enjoyable experience, particularly dinner before the meeting. There is always a good sized group at the meetings, which is very impressive. The Bureau County society is very active and very successful in their endeavors--a really good society to model for those in a rural area. A google search will pull up their website for those who have Bureau County ancestors.

The price of Casefile Clues was $15 when the review was written and when the newsletter went to press (annual rate is now $17). Society members who would like to subscribe at the $15 rate can do so, just email me the last name of the new society member from Springfield as listed in your newsletter and I'll send you a link that will give you the $15 rate. My email is mjnrootdig@gmail.com.

Thanks Jane for mentioning Casefile Clues. I appreciate it.

Charting out the Relationships

2010-01-18T16:49:00.002-06:00

We've even started including more relationship charts in Casefile Clues--something that is helpful whether you are "writing up" a family or not.

Seeing how the relationships fit can be helpful when working on a family, whether you are just starting on it or whether you have been analyzing it for some time. And charts are always helpful when you reader or relative is not as familiar with the family as you are. Names do tend to run together, especially

Receipts are Great Places to get Signatures

2010-01-18T16:31:00.003-06:00

Receipts from estate settlements are also great places to get signatures. This one comes from Hancock County, Illinois, in 1871, when Barbara Trautfetter/Trautvetter is signing for her share in the state of Michael Trautvetter--her brother-in-law.

She made her mark on this one, but all the others signed their name. Remember that making a mark does not mean the person was illiterate. It just means that they made their mark. In some cases, the person was literate, but unable to write due to infirmity or age. I have seen individuals sign and make their marks on different documents at different points in their life.

This estate settlement was analyzed in this week's issue of Casefile Clues. There were more clues in the settlement that just the signatures, but those are always interesting.

New Subscriber Offce for Casefile Clues

2010-01-18T13:59:00.002-06:00

Special offer on Casefile Clues:

Get back issues 1-25 and a year's subscription for only $27.50 here https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=11268556

Casefile Clues is my weekly genealgoy how-to newsletter focusing on research sources and methods---not just what's "new."

Email me at mjnrootdig@gmail.com if the link doesn't work. A sample can be requested by sending me an email at mjnrootdig@gmail.com

Thanks!

Casefile Clues Subscriber Contest Announced 17 January 2010

2010-01-16T20:21:00.000-06:00

We'll be announcing our "Find Valentine" contest in the cover email with issue 25 of Casefile Clues. It will be sent out tomorrow (Sunday). Only subscribers who are subscribing before issue 25 goes out tomorrow will be allowed to play. Join now to get in on the fun.

Current subscribers are eligible and if you want to subscribe now and get in on the fun, you can do so securely here.

There's no real deadline to find him, but by 14 February would be nice! Good luck....

2010 Family History Library Research Trip Registration Page Fixed

2010-01-16T00:11:00.001-06:00

Finally fixed the regular registration fee page for my 2010 trip to the FHL in SLC http://www.rootdig.com/slctrip_paypal.htm.

Trip details are at http://www.rootdig.com/slctrip.html

We always have a great time at the Family History Library in Salt Lake.

Join us!

Ancestry Magazine---some thoughts

2010-01-15T22:38:00.003-06:00

I posted earlier that Ancestry Magazine is ceasing publication with the March/April 2010 issue. I noted that several other genealogy bloggers mentioned it, but I really didn't see any comments on it other than they were sorry to see it go. I was hoping to hear a little opinion on any thoughts as to why the decision was made to end the print magazine.

I don't claim to have any more knowledge than anyone else, but a part of me is really not surprised. Print publications in genealogyland face stiff competition from the large quantity of free how-to information on the internet related to genealogy. Obtaining general information on a specific topic online is fairly easy, although the quality and accuracy of such online information varies greatly from one site and one author to another. Some are highly accurate and helpful. Others, not so much. But when a magazine is geared towards the "genealogy masses," as Ancestry magazine was, the competition from the internet (especially blogs) is fairly intense.

I'm not certain the economy is really to blame.

People subscribe to something when they can see how it benefits them and (in the case of a genealogy magazine) their research. Money is also a factor. I actually let my subscription to Ancestry magazine lapse several years ago as it just wasn't meeting my needs. I need specifics when I read how-to articles and I need details, more than usually are contained in shorter articles. My decision to let my subscription lapse had nothing to do with the internet, but I suspect that for many genealogists, it did.

I'm curious to see what others think about this decision.

Casefile Clues (my own weekly how-to newsletter) is still operational and I hope to continue it for quite some time. Changes for the better have been made since I began self-distribution in July of 2009. I used to occasionally write for Ancestry magazine years ago and also wrote a weekly column for their genealogy ezine for at least six or seven years. Editing my own publication has decidedly more headaches than writing for someone else, but there are several advantages:

I can write whatever I want
Word length is at my discretion
I don't have to worry about any advertisers (Casefile Clues accepts no advertising and has none on it's website http://www.casefileclues.com)
It is a hell of a lot more fun
Writing about them justifies my obsession with the Trautvetter family (Casefile Clues readers know that this family illustrates just about every research pitfall known to man)
I enjoy getting feedback from readers
I'm always excited when I get a new or renewing subscriber

To see what Casefile Clues is all about, request sample information by sending an email to samples@casefileclues.com